Sunday, October 16, 2016

Donald Trump Conspiracy Theory and The Protocols of the Elders Of Zion ... and now the Jews after dispensing with The Pope and Catholics,Immigrants, Muslims, Mexicans LBGTQ Community, Journalists and the whole American Constitution and the Rule of Law . Hey Ho Jay for Anarchy and El Duce Ditlery Donald Trump( Republished with permission of The Atlantic Magazine)

Trump's Dangerous Conspiracy Theory (Republished with permission of The Atlantic)

Image result for Nzai Anti semitic depictions of JewsImage result for Trump Long Pictures

Blame the “international banks.” controlled by the Jews  is the central concept of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion (Russian: Протоколы сионских мудрецов) or The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion is an antisemitic fabricated text purporting to describe a Jewish plan for global domination. The forgery was first published in Russia in 1903, translated into multiple languages, and disseminated internationally in the early part of the 20th century. According to the claims made by some of its publishers, the Protocols are the minutes of a late 19th-century meeting where Jewish leaders discussed their goal of global Jewish hegemonyby subverting the morals of Gentiles, and by controlling the press and the world's economies.
Henry Ford funded printing of 500,000 copies that were distributed throughout the U.S. in the 1920s. Adolf Hitler was a major proponent. It was studied, as if factual, in German classrooms after the Nazis came to power in 1933,[1] despite having been exposed as fraudulent by The Times ofLondon in 1921. It is still widely available today in numerous languages, in print and on the Internet, and continues to be presented by some proponents as a genuine document.
 From  Wikipedia Article On The Protocols of the Elders of Zion)

When Donald Trump took the stage in his own defense on Thursday, he didn’t just denounce the women who had accused him of sexual assault; he didn’t merely attack the media outlets that had aired their stories. He came out swinging, denouncing his foes as tools of a global conspiracy against decent Americans:
It's a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth, and put that money into the pockets of a handful large corporations and political entities. Just look at what this corrupt establishment has done to our cities like Detroit, Flint, Michigan, and rural towns in Pennsylvania, Ohio, North Carolina, and all across our country. Take a look at what's going on. They've stripped away these towns bare, and raided the wealth for themselves, and taken our jobs away, out of our country, never to return unless I'm elected president.  
The Clinton Machine is at the center of this power structure. We've seen this first hand in the Wikileaks documents, in which Hillary Clinton meets in secret with international banks, to plot the destruction of U.S. sovereignty in order to enrich these global interest powers, her special interest friends, and her donors.
So true. Honestly, she should be locked up. She should be.
This sort of rhetoric comes back into style every few decades in America. Politicians tell Americans that a sinister conspiracy is to blame for their misery. In 1951, for example, Joe McCarthy inveighed against “a great conspiracy, a conspiracy on a scale so immense as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man.” And there’s an odd comfort to conspiratorial thinking: Instead of finding themselves at the mercy of complex forces that grind ahead to a logic of their own, conspiracy theories encourage audiences to detect the machinations of puppet-masters pulling the strings. If there’s a small group of people to be blamed, then their work can be stopped, or even reversed. The human mind is a spectacular tool for discerning patterns; so superb, in fact, that it can create patterns where only randomness prevails.

But the specific conspiracy matters, too. Trump was speaking to local communities suffering from a feeling of dislocation, a sense that they have lost control of their own destiny and are at the mercy of shadowy forces. He charged that Clinton and other corrupt politicians are plundering the American heartland, despoiling it as part of a cabal of “international banks” and “global interests,” taking American wealth and funneling it abroad.

That language has a complicated history in America. It has sometimes been used by those who loathe the lords of finance in straightforward and uncomplicated ways. But at least as often, it has been invoked by politicians trafficking in thinly disguised anti-Semitism or over bigotry, encouraging their audiences to chase the money changers from the Temple.

In the 1880s, a Populist pamphlet, The Seven Financial Conspiracies Which Have Enslaved the American People, told the story of the nation’s takeover by a “bankers’ government” as the seven acts of Shylock. Language like that could be found throughout the Populist revolt of the 1890s, although not everyone embraced it. The Great Commoner, William Jennings Bryan, took pains to insist that his use of such language should not be taken as support for anti-Semitism, as he ran for president in 1896. “I do not know of any class of our people who, by reason of their history, can better sympathize with the struggling masses in this campaign than can the Hebrew race,” he said. Not all of his supporters agreed. A New York crowd packed into Cooper Union to hear the Rothschilds denounced by Mary Ellen Lease, a Populist stump speaker: “A London Jew has been made the receiver of these United States,” she thundered.

In the depths of the Great Depression, Father Charles E. Coughlin took to the airwaves to denounce “international bankers and those in league with them.” At the height of his popularity, when this rhetoric found its widest resonance, Coughlin depicted a Christian society held hostage by money changers—but insisted that the Jew “is just as much a child of God as the best of you are.” But after his fall from grace, his speeches grew darker and more conspiratorial still, and he crossed over into explicit anti-Semitism, blaming Jews for America’s ills.

Trump’s campaign is now being run by Steve Bannon, lately the executive chairman of Breitbart, which has been accused with some frequency of peddling anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. But there was nothing in Trump’s speech on Thursday to suggest he was deliberately deploying anti-Semitic tropes. Indeed, as his supporters often hasten to point out, his own daughter Ivanka and son-in-law Jared Kushner are Jewish.

The trouble is that—as has so often been the case this year—the language Trump has chosen to employ carries with it heavy cultural baggage. And whatever he intends, there are Americans who will find it frightening to hear these images revived—and others who will feel emboldened by their use to go where Trump himself did not.

From the Holocaust Encyclopedia of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum On Line Data Base (https://www.ushmm.org/)

PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION

'A Dangerous Lie: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' opened in the Gonda Education Center at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in April 2006.
'A Dangerous Lie: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' opened in the Gonda Education Center at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in April 2006.
— US Holocaust Memorial Museum

  • View Photographs

  • View Artifacts
"If ever a piece of writing could produce mass hatred, it is this one. . . . This book is about lies and slander."
—Elie Wiesel, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is the most notorious and widely distributed antisemitic publication of modern times. Its lies about Jews, which have been repeatedly discredited, continue to circulate today, especially on the Internet. The individuals and groups who have used the Protocols are all linked by a common purpose: to spread hatred of Jews.
The Protocols is entirely a work of fiction, intentionally written to blame Jews for a variety of ills. Those who distribute it claim that it documents a Jewish conspiracy to dominate the world. The conspiracy and its alleged leaders, the so-called Elders of Zion, never existed.
THE ORIGIN OF A LIE
In 1903, portions of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were serialized in a Russian newspaper, Znamya (The Banner). The version of the Protocols that has endured and has been translated into dozens of languages, however, was first published in Russia in 1905 as an appendix to The Great in the Small: The Coming of the Anti-Christ and the Rule of Satan on Earth, by Russian writer and mystic Sergei Nilus.
Although the exact origin of the Protocols is unknown, its intent was to portray Jews as conspirators against the state. In 24 chapters, or protocols, allegedly minutes from meetings of Jewish leaders, the Protocols "describes" the "secret plans" of Jews to rule the world by manipulating the economy, controlling the media, and fostering religious conflict.
Following the Russian Revolution of 1917, anti-Bolshevik émigrés brought the Protocols to the West. Soon after, editions circulated across Europe, the United States, South America, and Japan. An Arabic translation first appeared in the 1920s.
Beginning in 1920, auto magnate Henry Ford's newspaper, The Dearborn Independent, published a series of articles based in part on the Protocols. The International Jew, the book that included this series, was translated into at least 16 languages. Both Adolf Hitler and Joseph Goebbels, later the Nazi Minister of Propaganda, praised Ford and The International Jew.
FRAUD EXPOSED
In 1921, the London Times presented conclusive proof that the Protocols was a "clumsy plagiarism." The Times confirmed that the Protocols had been copied in large part from a French political satire that never mentioned Jews—Maurice Joly's Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (1864). Other investigations revealed that one chapter of a Prussian novel, Hermann Goedsche's Biarritz(1868), also "inspired" the Protocols.
THE NAZI ERA
Nazi party ideologue Alfred Rosenberg introduced Hitler to the Protocols during the early 1920s, as Hitler was developing his worldview. Hitler referred to the Protocols in some of his early political speeches, and, throughout his career, he exploited the myth that "Jewish-Bolshevists" were conspiring to control the world.
During the 1920s and 1930s, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion played an important part in the Nazis' propaganda arsenal. The Nazi party published at least 23 editions of the Protocols between 1919 and 1939. Following the Nazis' seizure of power in 1933, some schools used the Protocols to indoctrinate students.
FRAUD EXPOSED
In 1935, a Swiss court fined two Nazi leaders for circulating a German-language edition of the Protocols in Berne, Switzerland. The presiding justice at the trial declared the Protocols "libelous," "obvious forgeries," and "ridiculous nonsense."
The US Senate issued a report in 1964 declaring that the Protocolswere "fabricated." The Senate called the contents of the Protocols"gibberish" and criticized those who "peddled" the Protocols for using the same propaganda technique as Hitler.
In 1993, a Russian court ruled that Pamyat, a far-right nationalist organization, had committed an antisemitic act by publishing theProtocols.
Despite these repeated exposures of the Protocols as a fraud, it remains the most influential antisemitic text of the past one hundred years, and it continues to appeal to a variety of antisemitic individuals and groups.
THE PROTOCOLS TODAY
According to the US Department of State's "Report on Global Anti-Semitism" (2004), "The clear purpose of the [Protocols is] to incite hatred of Jews and of Israel."
In the United States and Europe, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and Holocaust deniers endorse and circulate the Protocols. Books based on the Protocols are available worldwide, even in countries with hardly any Jews such as Japan.
Many school textbooks throughout the Arab and Islamic world teach the Protocols as fact. Countless political speeches, editorials, and even children's cartoons are derived from the Protocols. In 2002, Egypt's government-sponsored television aired a miniseries based on the Protocols, an event condemned by the US State Department. The Palestinian organization Hamas draws in part on the Protocols to justify its terrorism against Israeli civilians.
The Internet has dramatically increased access to the Protocols. Even though many Web sites expose the Protocols as a fraud, the Internet has made it easy to use the Protocols to spread hatred of Jews. Today, a typical Internet search yields several hundred thousand sites that disseminate, sell, or debate the Protocols or expose them as a fraud.

No comments:

Post a Comment